|
|
Today, on a day which will live in infamy, the Democrat politcal arm of the Florida justice system again hops for their collective masters in what probably will result as a sham hearing of oral arguments in appealing Judge Saul's ruling in Gore versus Harris ( Two Strikes You're Out! ( 12-4-2000 ) ). I was saddened and disgusted to see that the partisan political glasses which the so-called Florida Supreme Court ( KANGAROO COURT ( 11-22-2000 ) ) have been wearing since Thanksgiving ( Thankgiving Kangaroos ( 11-23-2000 ) ), have not been removed ( Hopping and Bopping at the Florida Kangaroo Court? ( 11-20-2000 ) ) and they are still acting like the Gestapo of the National Socialist Wing of the Democrat Party ( Florida Supreme Kangaroo Court Has Gore Votes in Their Pouches! 11-25-2000 ) ).
Chief Justice Charles Wells ushered in the latest rerun of the Florida Justice System Circus Minimus. I would have thought that these Democrat partisans ( with one a Democrat/Independent in name only ) would have been put in their place by both the United States Supreme Court, who scolded them like an elementary school kid who has just claimed the dog ate his or her homework, or the news that David Boies lied to them in the first case misciting and using as it's base for argument an Illinois statute which rejected so-called dimpled ballots, but claiming it said the exact opposite. Well, I was wrong. This Kangaroo Court came out swinging at the Bush Campaign attorney Barry Richard and embracing their holy Gore Campaign lawyer ( liar? ) David Boies!
Boies was really looking haggard, though his spirits were lifted at the attitude of the so-called justices ( and this group really does not deserve to be called that in the least ). Saying, " The Legislature is passing laws it knows is(sic) going to be interpreted by the court ". Okay, what else is (k)new? I contend, and many other do as well, that the Florida Kangaroos pulled something out of their pouches, not clarifying some pre-existing statute!
The Kangaroos hopped in both trio and duet, led by the Ringmaster Wells.
The first trio was Justices Lewis, Wells and Pariente, who really reminds me of Carol Roberts in ideology, as in EXTREME LEFT WING IDEOLOGS ( Carol Roberts For President ( 11-13-2000 ) ). Lewis feigned objectivity but was actually just setting up his fellow RAT Boies with, " If you have identified under votes, why doesn't it apply to every county in the state "? This allowed Boies to legalese, " It does have statewide applications, if the contest is statewide and not the particualr counties we are asking for ". Wells joined the contest for straight man of the millennium by setting up Boies with, " There is no common law right to contest votes ", asking the question to open the door to counting ballots, if the party, " merely alleges there has to be a count "? This led Boies to RECITE THE DIRTYcRAT MANTRA DU'JOUR, " We have identified specific votes where you could clearly ascertain the voter's intent " ( here goes the old DIMPLE ROUTINE again? ).
I AM REALLY GETTING TIRED OF HOW EASILY BOIES CAN LIE TO A PANEL OF SO-CALLED JUDGES. Boies said, " This is not just a case of someone coming in and wanting another chance ". HUH? THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IT IS!
Pariente gave Boies another setup, which he didn't take advantage of, " Is there something different between Palm Beach, Broward and Dade, with other counties that use punch card ballots "? Boies had no answer yet, because the actual answer is that THEY ARE RAT CAGES ( heavy Democrat counties )! He finally realized the set-up straight line and whimpered another continuing RAT LIE, " Judge Burton identified 215 ballots "...( Exterminating The Rats? ( 12-3-2000 ) ). COME ON MAN, GET YOUR LIES STRAIGHT.
Bush attorney Barry Richard was PUNCHED BY BOXING KANGAROO RATS in mass.
Richard managed to say, in between attacks on his position, " You can't disregard the statutory scheme and fashion a remedy that goes against the legislature ". Funny, that seems to be exactly what they did in handing down their first politically charged so-called decision which was thrown back in their faces by the United States Supreme Court.
Justices Anstead, Pariente and Lewis did a trio on Richard while Justices Quince and Shaw seemed to prefer a duet.
TRIO:
Anstead, a Kangaroo talking like a DNC operative or DIRTYcRAT media talking head, began by insinuating that the ballots should have been looked at. This was very similar to the COUNT ALL THE VOTES RAT MANTRA which you see all the talking heads repeating endlessly all day and night long on cable television. Anstead was to go back to this strategy over and over again in support of the other two in his trio. Pariente joined in the hopping act, " The circuit court is to look at every ballot brought before it ". I guess there is no doubt what flavor pouch she came out of? She partisanly described the situation as, " The failure of the machine to count a vote properly cast "? This is so sad folks, as we all know this is the DIRTYcRATS trying to ELECT THEIR BOY GORE ON THE FACE OF DIMPLED BALLOTS, which may or may not even be votes at all to any observer who isn't a GORE UBER ALLES or DNC LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT type! Pariente continued her RAT ADVOCACY with, " There are 9 thousand votes that never have been counted ". What a piece of work. Lewis hopped to it like a good little appointed DIRTYcRAT insinuating the situation was like misplacing ballots or voters forcibly kept away from the polls? He must have internalized the black racist spew Jesse Jackson was vomitting yesterday at a RAT MOB GATHERING?
DUET:
Barry Richard could only offer, as a defense for Miami-Dade stopping their endless recounting, " No person or entity can be forced into a futile act ". Justices Quince and Shaw did their doubt-as-cause duet. Richard offered, " Partial recounts violates the United States Constitution ". He finally got to add, " Should not have counted any dimples "!
Joe Klock was cut off short and only got to say, " The legislature has the power to select electors ". They cut him off as he warned about the bench making, " a change of law "!
THESE KANGAROO RATS PUT BOIES BACK UP TO YET AGAIN HAVE ADDITIONAL TIME? MAN, THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT IS A COMPLETE DISGRACE TO JUDGES AND COURTS WORLDWIDE!!!
It should be ( have been ) abundantly clear to all the possibly corrupt and obviously partisan political nature and make-up of this so-called Florida Supreme Court. The time allocations for oral arguments were supposed to be 30 minutes for Boies, 30 minutes for Richard and 10 minutes for Klock, but they were vastly skewed toward the Gore counsel Boies. They gave David Boies over 40 minutes, Richard slightly over or around 20 minues and Klock got less than 10? This is proof postive of the purely partisan political nature of this so-called judicial body, which could more aptly be described as the SOAP OPERA VERSION OF THE COURT OF POPULAR OPINION, playing to the combined television coverage and not the law of the land ( of Oz? )!
After today's despicible performance there can be no doubt that the so-called Florida Supreme Court ( and I do use this term under extreme duress and the lightness of the gravity level of the International Space Station ) is in actuality an extension of some misguided dastardly Clinton/Gore Royal Court! We await their decision to see if they are truely the stuff which a dictatorship's faux justice system is made of!
- Bongo ( Line up all your lawyers nose to tail? )
