<bgsound src="lucifer.wav">

Emotional Dismissal or dismissal of emotion?

The Senate Impeachment Trial for The Removal of President William Jefferson Clinton.

*January 25, 1999 Day Nine. A motion to dismiss is considered?*

Now playing in Washington D.C. in the United States Senate, the somatic process of validating the current Whitehouse dictatorship! The Senate Democrats have succeeded in showing themselves to be the tools of their precious first philanderer, Bill Clinton.

Debate on a motion of dismissal brought by Democrat Senator Robert ' Flip The ' Byrd began with Charles Canady, of the House Managers, addressing the Senate on Bill Clinton's calculated choice to repeatedly break the rule of law ( by committing perjury and obstruction of justice ). " He has never accepted the responsibility for breaking the law...he remains adamently unrepentant ".

From the party who brought us Jimmy Hoffa ( JFK ), Vietnam ( LBJ ), the Iran hostage crisis ( Jimmy Carter ) and now the free first action of sexual harassment ( Slick Willie ), Nicole Seligman of Clinton's defense team adressed the Senate for Robert Byrd? I guess this just about proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, the master/slave relationship between Clinton/Byrd! What is a President Clinton defense attorney doing speaking for a Democrat Senator? It was the same old BS, just delivered by a new female voice. If you agreed with her ( Byrd? ) you believe the House didn't have the right to pass these articles, the articles themselves are unConstitutional and the President has done nothing wrong. As I was dozing off do to Seligman's unemotional monotone voice, I realized the words she was reading, were the written words of Greg Craig? Yes, when you began to lose consciousness, the voice beame clearly that of Comrade Commissar Greg Craig!

Lindsey Graham made an emotional plea for the Senate not to cut the process short. He wants to have a meaningful trial with a vote on guilt or innocence, whatever the end result!

Before the vote on dismissal, Democrat Tom Harkin introduced a motion to hold all debate and deliberations in public. In the ensuing vote, Democrats Byrd and Sarbanes voted ' no ', by the way. The final vote was 57 to 43 for defeat ( it needed a 2/3rds majority to pass ). The day they allow the television cameras into jury deliberations, is the day our court system becomes the Jerry Springer Show. Some Democrats were already salivating at the chance to showboat for the media! The Senate of The 106th Congress then went into closed session for debate.

Hey man, the stupid talking heads are always remarking about the Republicans trying to save face. I believe the Democrats have a lot of explaining to do, if they vote to keep their precious immoral first philandering dictator in the highest office of the land!

- Bongo ( Democrats must throw their Whitehouse obedience training aside and do their Constitutional duty ( fat chance ). )


Opinions expressed here are those of the individuals themselves; and may not necessarily reflect those of BONGO'S FALLOUT SHELTER.

Is it really safe in here?

Updated ( 1-25-99 )
(c)1999 Bongo.