On this last Sunday of 1998, the Democrat legislators who appeared on the television talk shows, proved beyond a shadow of a doubt, they are united behind their beloved first philanderer no matter what he does or has done. Even the so-called rational moderate Democrats show their outstanding level of DNC obedience training, in defense of immorality and lying under oath before a Federal Grand Jury, by a chief executive only if he is a Democrat. These guys would be asking for the President's head, if he were a Republican! Have no doubt about it; the Whitehouse/DNC legislative robots in the Senate will most likely ignore decency, morality, the law and the Constitution to keep their precious President in office, if today is any example of how they will be acting or voting. Guys like Lanny Davis should just put a sock in their mouths, as it is now up the Senate. They can continue to spout their pollaganda bile, but the best attention should now be paid to the way individual Senators eventually vote and why. The American people will at least be able to judge for themselves, the motivation behind their elected Senator's actions. We may gather some insight, by these Senators speaking their minds on the Sunday political television forums.

On ' Eat The Rest ', Tim Russert gave two Democrat Senators, one blatantly partisan and one supposed moderate, an enema to see what would come out. He also had three pundits of note on the small screen. He showed Mike McCurry, former Whitehouse press secretary, a BBC interview where he is quite tough on Bill Clinton. McCurry did a complete flip flop, and changed his tune on everything. Lauding Clinton, he said that he and his wife wanted to put a sign on their front lawn saying, " Enough is enough, and let's move on ". William Bennet told McCurry of his BBC appearence, " You committed a gaff, and told the truth ". Bennet continued with two quotes of note. " I am concerned about what this President's actions have done to the Presidency. If lying to the Grand Jury is okay for a President, what else is?" Pat Robertson said of Clinton, " he becomes a role model, like it or not ". On possibly questionable policy decisions designed to help his personal approval ratings, Robertson added, " there are suspicions about everything he does ".

Democrat Senators Tom Daschle and Daniel Patrick Moynihan jumped through some Whitehouse/DNC hoops in a show of how well they have been trained by Bill Clinton! Most folks know and realize that Daschle is just a clone of the House partisan ' lie deny and stick to it - DNC love it or leave it ' mentality examples of John Conyers and Richard Gephardt. Daschle started with a prediction on a Senate vote for Clinton's removal, " You would need 67 and I don't think they are there ". If this isn't partisan, duty and law avoiding, pure party before justice talk, I don't know what is! These guys are supposed to have a trial and judge the evidence, before making their decision ( casting their vote ). They are showing the strength of their Whitehouse/DNC brain washing or loyalty above the rule of law for the sake of their fearless party leader. This looks more like Communists voting in the Duma, than a democracy in action! When pushed, he refused to say Clinton lied. Amazingly, he did acknowledge that the ' lame duck Congress defense won't work '. Sadly, but not unpredictably, he said of the Presidential post impeachment pep rally, " I think it was the right thing to do ". Moynihan had been held up as a voice of reason of Democrat Senators, but showed that this has all been a big choreographed charade to fool the public into thinking there were some non-partisan Democrats in the supposedly more civil body of the Senate. When asked whether lying under oath is an impeachable offense, he answered " yes ". He then opined of Clinton's offenses, " These are not high crimes and misdemeanors "? On the final outcome he predicted, " We will have a trial and there will be censure ". The three DNC learned commands these guys revealed were; 1) the President will not admitt he lied and/or the President didn't lie, 2) Democrats will vote on loyalty to their President and not the Constitution, and 3) there will be a toothless censure with no Presidential admission of any form of guilt!

On ' Defaced Damnation ', we had both flavors of Senators.

The Republican, Orrin Hatch, displayed the no nonsense approach of the vast majority of his party's Senators. He started with, " We have to begin the trial. After the trial begins, headcounts can be taken ". A much different approach to that of some Senate Democrats, who seem to have all made up their minds before the proceedings have even started. Hatch did talk about the state of a possible Senate vote on removal, but characterized it as not final, " Right now we probably don't have the 2/3rds needed ". When questioned on the possibility of censure and the inclusion of an admission of ' lying under oath ' by Clinton within it's language he said, " He has to admit it...get rid of the phoney set of legal parsing and hair splitting that really has gotten him in this trouble to begin with ".

The Democrat Senator, John Breaux, was really pushing for best of breed at the DNC dog obedience show. Not only did he successfully avoid admitting that the President lied under oath, but he also defended the House Democrat censure motion as being very strong language with, " false information was provided and false statements made ". He didn't say that this was in reference to Clinton's January finger wagging speech, and not for anything in a judicial proceeding! He pushed Clinton's begging for CENSURE AND NOT REMOVAL, " I believe censure is appropriate ". He hit the DNC scare tactic mantra well with, " A trial punishes the country, not the President ". He exposed the final DNC mantra on avoiding a Senate trial completely with, " Do it now, get it behind us ". He did also make sure to attack some of the OIC impeachment referral information as, " rumors and inuendos ". The marks from the Whitehouse/DNC choke chain are really showing on that dog's neck!

On the possibly DNC sponsored but definately Democrat leaning CNN, Wolf Blitzer wanted to see what condition his ' edition ' was in. He had two Representitives to offer advice to the Senate. Republican David Dreier was impartial and said to " leave it to the United States Senate ". He muttered the only perceptable Republican mantra on a Senate trial, though a very serious and sobering one, with, " set precedent for the future ". Democrat Charles Rangel was busy proving that his Whitehouse/DNC training was really complete. Not to my complete and utter surprise, he said, " The President has suffered enough...the Senate doesn't have to have a trial ". Whoa, wait a second Martha. He then attacked the Republicans by describing them using words like " hatred " and " animosity ". He rationalized Clinton's actions as " stupid " and " silly ", but avoided admitting that Clinton did anything illegal? He finished with an attack on the OIC investigation and the House of Representitives, including words like " lynching " and " treated him unfairly ". Hey Charlie, ' arf arf arf '; or is it, ' woof woof woof '?

' This Week's ' Geeks chose not to televise the Whitehouse/DNC obedience trials, and featured Republicans. Personally, I would have liked to see more Demodogs put through their paces. Representitive Bob Frank thought before any kind of censure motion could be taken up, the President should, " admitt to the American people what they already know; he broke the law ". Representitive Jim Greenwood took umbridge with the Whitehouse pep rally, held just after Clinton's impeachment vote, describing it as, " a grotesque display of celebration, in the rose garden, after the President was impeached ". Senator John Ashcroft on censure, " the level of censure ( House impeachment vote ) is the strongest allowed by law. " He thought the Senate should have a trial and said, " this is not Judge Ito, this is not OJ ". Senator Rick Santorum thought the Senators should " judge impartially " and " look at the precedent we are setting for history ". There's that one Republican mantra, again.

I am really interested to see just how the Senate Democrat robots rationalize their votes to keep the current Executive branch dictator in office!

- Bongo ( Speak boy, speak... )