I assume that Time Magazine understands that their reputation has been forever diminished by their association with CNN in the Tailwind story. Has the television talking head show influx made them think " sensationalism " before " truth " in reporting? I believe a good arguement could be made for this point. I will refrain from making that until I see what they finally print, to make up for the slanderous-like story they helped to produce and distribute!

I would like to believe that they were fooled by the ex-CNN reporters involved. If not, the rag isn't fit for outhouse material!

Lets get back to reporting the news, guys; okay???

Check the " Is it safe in here " section, for my two opinions on the CNN Tailwind piece and retraction of same.

- Bongo ( the Time-National Inquirer team-up may be coming soon... )