For President Bill Clinton and his army of immoral and indecent left wing Democrat cronies, the only thing to be worshipped is their power over the common decent folk of the world. In order for him and his devils to achieve this, he must promote world socialism under the guise of peacekeeping and economic prosperity. This is the big lie, put forth by our self confessed liar-in-chief who inhabits 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

The first step in accomplishing this world socialist government, is to change the meaning of true and false ( good and evil, if you wish ). This is not just a regurgitation of the old, " is the cup half empty or half full ", but a bid for worldwide moral relativism to replace actual truth and falsity! I believe truth eternal and unchanging, not relative. It is not capricous, depending only on whim and circumstance to determine it's validity! Philosophers have debated the question of absolute truth versus relativism for centuries, but nobody has ever used this to escape responsibility for his own actions the way Bill Clinton has. After a few years of success, the entire liberal establishment has embraced this ideal and used it to rationalize it's mistakes and to attack it's enemies. This sick version of " political correctness " is the ammunition of the ultra-rich, far left wing radical liberals around the world, who would subjugate the rest of us in the name of saving us from ourselves!

Let's take a look around the world and see who has been falling for this line of bullshit and/or embracing it in a conspiracy along with our living God, President Bill Clinton.

It certainly looks like the American people have fallen for it hook line and sinker!

Bill Clinton has replaced, " do unto others as you would have them do unto you " with a sick and phoney caricature of the 60s phrase, " do your own thing ". The problem with this, is that it ignores other people's feelings, and seems to legitimize just about any conduct as acceptable? It opens the door to hedonistic conduct that can be truely damaging to our culture ( not that there is much left anymore to damage ) and to the survival of the human race as a whole ( AIDS for instance ). Representitive Henry Hyde said this to the Senators last month, " I wonder if, after this culture war is over that we are engaged in, an America will survive that will be worth fighting to defend ''. He has a great line of thought there, and we just may be heading toward a big dive in the twenty first century. If you don't believe our society has traded in morality for promiscuity ( sad that promis{e} is part of that word ), and explains it all away using morally relativistic terms and excuses, then why have people been writing books with titles like: " Slouching Towards Gomorrah ", by Robert Bork and " The Death of Outrage ", by William Bennet, huh? Well there is no doubt that outrage is missing from the vocabulary of most Democrats ( unless they are expressing phoney outrage while changing the subject to attack the messenger, aka' Ken Starr ), and we all should know that Gomorrah was a town destroyed by God for a complete breakdown of any system of morality!

Back in the Watergate days, public officials would resign when faced with the ultimate embarassment and caught in lies and illegal or questionable conspiracies. Now, they hold on to their jobs with a death grip! When President Richard Nixon ordered Archibald Cox fired for subpoenas he had served on the White House for Watergate evidence, Attorney General Elliot Richardson quit instead. His deputy did, also and " The Saturday Night Massacre " was born ( Oct. 20, 1973 ). Clinton just disregarded and/or delayed delivering subpoenaed materials, and we all know what a puppet Janet Reno actually is!

Our Buddhist monk loving ( or was it just their money? ) Vice-President Al Gore has fallen into lock-step with his flagrantly immoral first philanderer. " He would not become Clinton's hatchet man ", writes Robert Zelnick, a former ABC News correspondent. I guess he didn't see that disgusting little post-impeachment party in the Whitehouse Rose Garden? Wasn't that Al baby, dialing for dollars illegally from the Whitehouse for his beloved Caesar of D.C.? Oh, that's right; there was " no controlling legal authority ", on this one ( that is the relativistic rationalization of why it wasn't illegal and only a sleazy thing to do ). Associated Press is reporting, " From traffic jams to dirty drinking water, Al Gore is tackling bite-sized problems to impress swing voters for the 2000 presidential campaign. The vice president's schedule this week could have come from President Clinton's 1996 playbook: promising uniforms for school children, safety locks for handguns, and a host of similar poll-tested quality of life initiatives. Though Clinton was accused of pandering, the strategy helped convince voters -- particularly suburbanites and parents -- that he cared about the quality of their lives. Gore intends to do the same ". Al Gore has obviously sold his soul to the Devil as well as Bill Clinton! AP continued, " They're not small ideas,'' the vice president said in an interview Friday. " They're important ideas ". Who is Gore trying to kid? He is only following the socialist agenda and paying royal homage to his grand imperious leader, the American Pharoah Bill Clinton!

Clinton is trying to pull the wool over the American public's collective eyes with a pile of lies about the budget and saving Social Security that began back at his 1999 State of The Union Address, wherein he promised something to everybody, but to not use the budget surplus to pay for anything ( he continues to say the exact same things, while only pledging to save only a majority of the budget for Social Security )? You can't have it both ways, except in your imagination. This can only be interpreted as campaign promise-like blatant lies ( like promising not to coddle lobbyists way back in 1992 but doubling their numbers and multiplying the money spent on they by over one hundred times! ). I am hip to his direct calculated conspiracy of lies, designed for one purpose only - TO GET DEMOCRATS ELECTED IN 2000 DESPITE ANY UNREPAIRABLE DAMAGE DONE TO OUR REPUBLIC. AP sees this too reporting, " He's running around saying he's the one saving Social Security,'' said Pete Domenici, one of the architects of the GOP plan. " If saving the trust fund and not spending it is the test, we're 100 percent pure, and he's 58 percent pure.'' By setting aside that money, Republicans were hoping to protect themselves from Democratic accusations that they want to divert surpluses from Social Security and use the money for tax cuts for the wealthy ". There is not much chance of that, as the Democrats will say it anyhow, no matter whether or not it is true!

The Republicans are not taking this lying down any longer, as they do not want a repeat of last October, where Clinton got a pile of pork-barrel spending on pet socialist entitlement programs because the Republicans rolled over and died! The Speaker of The House Dennis Hastert said Republicans want to do more than put aside 62 percent of the budget surplus to shore up Social Security, as President Clinton has proposed. AP quotes Hastert, " Our proposal will lock away every penny of the Social Security surplus for our nation's senior citizens. It will also create a safe deposit box to make sure that these funds cannot be raided for wasteful spending programs ". Hastert continued, " Social Security is a trust fund for the American people, not a slush fund for the federal government to use it as it pleases " ( obviously referring to Clinton's crazy liberal Democrat tax and spend idealism ). AP also referred to Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, who voiced similar thoughts Friday, accusing Clinton of trying to turn Social Security into a slush fund for foreign aid by using it to help Central American victims of Hurricane Mitch. Lott's assertion was based on Clinton's plan to use federal surpluses to pay for the bulk of a $1.9 billion emergency measure approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee. All of this year's projected $111 billion budget surplus comes from the Social Security trust fund and emergency measures can use whatever budget revenues are legislated by Congress and the President ( don't look for Congress to okay this bit of positive poll number creating foreign welfare! ). So how can the Congress and Clinton get along when the Congress is working in the open using the truth, but the President is busy confusing the issues and trafficing in lies?

The Republicans are still occupying the moral high ground, and no Democrat can argue that they are not! Their candidates for the presidency in the year 2000 are ready and hoping that the public will want to see a more moral quality in it's leadership, after the completely morally bankrupt Clinton administration is ushered out of Washington. Texas Governor George Bush and Senator John McCain already have faced questioning. Bush concedes he " did some irresponsible things when I was young and irresponsible " and McCain has admitted to being responsible for the ending of his first marriage. They both feel that these things happened a long time ago and didn't involve any illegality; so they don't warrant further discussion. AP is reporting that " recent polls show a majority of Americans, about 60 percent, believe presidential candidates should be held to a higher moral standard than average Americans. But four out of five do not want candidates asked if they ever have committed adultery ". I hope this turns out to be the case!

You didn't hear ( or see ) this one on the Barbara Springer Show last Wednesday. Monica Lewinsky had an interview on BBC Channel Four where she got to dump some of her immature lies on an unsuspecting international viewing audience. " For the last ten months I have seen the Special Prosecutor, the press, the White House and the public ripping apart layer upon layer of my soul. I don't know what I did to deserve that humiliation "? You had the audacity to service the President with oral sex and stand to become a millionaire over it, so quit your crying, as nobody is listening! She continued, " Certainly I made mistakes and foolish judgments, but did they warrant this level of abuse? Yes, I probably am the most humiliated woman in the world, but I just can't deal with that thought. I have to block it out because it is too much to handle ". Well you should have thought about that, before you let Bill Clinton play hide the cigar in the Oval Orifice!

Clinton now tries to use his patented relativism to explain away why United States Marine Corps EA-6B Prowler pilot, Captain Richard Ashby was acquitted of involuntary manslaughter by a U.S. miltary tribunal. His aircraft directly caused the death of twenty people when it hit a skiing resort gondola cable. The gondola had just begun its ascent when Ashby's jet swooped into the valley on a training flight on February 3, 1998, and severed the cable with its wing, causing the gondola to crash to the valley floor below ( why does this make me think of the scene from the movie " Blue Max " where George Peppard and James Mason are flying their Fokkers under the spans of bridges over rivers? ). The king of apologizers, Bill Clinton, offered up one fit for the dumpster, saying Americans were " profoundly regretful and apologetic for what has occurred to the families and all of the people of Italy ". What about the victims? I didn't hear them included in this poor excuse for an apology ( though he did seem to accept full financial responsibility for the deaths in the name of the United States Marine Corps ). Massimo D'Alema, the Italian Prime Minister, was not taken in by Clinton's false sense of remorse and offered his own opinion, when quizzed by the assembled reporters, " We shall say we are satisfied when whoever is responsible for what happened is found guilty and punished ", and " With so many casualties and so many deaths, you can hardly ever say you are satisfied ". Man, I usually support our military with no questions asked, but like I questioned Clinton's motives bombing the innocent aspirin ( did you know it is the fifieth anniversary of aspirin this year? ) factory in Sudan and tents in the mountains of Afganistan, I question the motives of the USMC tribunal that exonerated Ashby. Having a wrong or incomplete map or a broken altimeter, would each by itself have been reason enough to scrub a training mission like that, in peace time ( we would have no arguement if this would been in time of conflict )!

Clinton's cancerous infection of political correctness and moral relativism has spread to other parts of the world!

In Germany there is debate on whether or not to leave the old Reichstag building in Berlin named just that, when it becomes the official seat of parliament again next month, after renovations have been completed. Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder believes it should remain what it has always been called since 1894, but some German lawmakers, including the parliamentary president, feel that " Reich " has a negative Nazi or Prussian connotation. They must decide before April 19th, and I hope they don't cave-in to this ridiculous offshore political correctness gone completely insane!

Why can't Bill Clinton leave Iraq alone? He has wagged the dog enough and U.S. aircraft have been bombing Iraqi targets daily since a few days before he was impeached by the House of Representitives last December. Yesterday, we bombed five sites in the northern no-fly zone near Mosul, a couple of hundred miles north of Baghdad. This is lunacy. We should have brought this neverending conflict to end an end years ago!

Why are our troops still in Bosnia? Clinton promised they would be out in a year, but they are still there after five! It is turning into a Vietnam-like situation, where the natives hate our soldiers and take out their hostilities on them. We have almost 7,000 troops stationed in Bosnia as part of the multinational peacekeeping force. It is being reported this week that one of these soldiers killed an unarmed Bosnian Serb, Krsto Micic. Evidently, a group of soldiers were in a civilian setting and incured the wrath of hard-line radicals from the town of Ugljevik. These civilians supposedly had clubs and were poised to strike, so the US soldiers drew his ( or maybe her? ) sidearm and shot and killed him. Just the kind of thing we need to foster cordial international relations! We must get the heck out of other country's business. Serbs close to the slain victim said this officially in Belgrade, " bloodthirsty American criminals and terrorists " shot Micic " in cold blood ". They continued, " American bandits ... will pay dearly for murdering Micic ". Great, just great; another vendetta or jihad is just what we needed!

Another hotspot we should either clear up right away or stay the heck out of is Kosovo. Like some replay of Krystalnacht, AP is reporting that " armed groups of Serbs rampaged through the central town of Lipljan on Friday night, smashing the windows of Albanian-owned stores, the Albanian-run Kosovo Information Center reported ". The Serbs told Bob Dole, ' yankee go home ' when they refused to issue him a visa to enter Yugoslavia. The Clinton administration is pushing for Albanians in Kosovo to accept a self-rule plan and not full autonomy, that would allow NATO allies to increase pressure on Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic to agree to stop the fighting and accept the peace plan. Clinton has been doing his paper tiger routine with the Serbs and they continue to call his bluff ( I mean all Clinton ever does is lie, deny and stick to it? ). It is being reported that Clinton delivered the NATO airstrike warning against Milosevic once again on Friday. Meanwhile, some analysts have accused the president of threatening NATO military action against Yugoslavia, only to back away. But Clinton cited NATO air strikes in 1995 against Serbs in Bosnia as evidence of the alliance's willingness to use force if necessary. " I don't think it's fair to say that NATO threatens and backs away ", he said and continued, " I don't think Milosevic is under any illusion that if NATO has an action order outstanding that we won't activate it. And I would be astonished to believe that our allies would back away from a commitment we've made ". Yeah, sure, right, whatever you say Bill. How can anyone trust the words of a self-confessed liar?

I guess the Libyans feel that they can't trust or negotiate with the Clinton administration. The United Nations has been trying to induce Libya to release the two suspects they have been harboring in the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie Scotland for trial. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan had to go to Libya personally, to talk to Mohammar Gadhafi. He actually may have been successful, as Gadhafi has arrived in Egypt to discuss that very thing with President Hosni Mubarak. Hopefully, the details can be worked out and this issue finally brought to a close ( but no thanks to the liar-in-chief from the United States )!

I wonder if Bill Clinton has compassion for the leftist rebels or their helpless victims, as Venezuelan terrorists executed three American humanitarian workers recently. The three were abducted by these suspected leftist rebels on February 25th and their bound, blindfolded and machine-gun riddled bodies were found in a cow pasture this week. They had been working with an indian tribe which lives along the border with Colombia, on a special reserve ( this may rule out drug lords? ).

I guess if you are going to truely embrace this relativism, you can't offer up any judgement on whether or not the deaths in Bosnia, Irag, Italy or Venezuela were right or wrong. Oh yeah, like what is right or wrong, anyhow? Do you have the answer? Bill Clinton does, though it changes from day to day, hour to hour, minute to minute, or realistically, second by second!

- Bongo ( Now don't parse any words, okay. )