|
|
*Is Slobodan Milosevic another Hitler? No. He may be a very minor version of another Stalin, but the numbers for Milosevic are so small, that any comparison is not valid.
*Is Bill Clinton ' wagging the dog '? I believe he is, but the ' wag the dog ' term is open to many different interpretations. It could just be an incredible coincidence that these attacks happened while the stories of witnesses turning evidence over on his scandals with Red China appeared.
*Is NATO acting as an aggressor? Oh yes. NATO has it's charter deeply routed in a defensive alliance, and has way over stepped it's bounds this time. It has no business meddling with the internal affairs of the Yugoslav Republic or the official jurisdiction to claim some phoney treaty obligation there. Yugoslavia has not attacked a NATO member nation, therefore NATO has no business getting involved!
*Whose civilian body count is larger, Bill Clinton's or Slobodan Milosevic's? We will have to wait until Clinton's dirty little undeclared war is finished, before we get an official tally ( it will probably be just as reliable as the old Vietnam body count routine? ) and come to a decision then. I bet if you combine the total civilian casualties from all Clinton's dog wagging, from Afganistan to Yugoslavia, it already exceeds that of all the combined forces under Milosevic in Kosovo ( not counting legitimate military losses ).
*Why are ( were ) refugees really fleeing the Kosovo province? The United States media would have you believe these refugees were fleeing from Serb atrocities, and they continued the propaganda barrage designed to hammer this lie home. Finally, over the last few days the truth has begun to leak out. Pristina is a ghost town of smoking ruins caused by the NATO bombing, and the people have fled because they belive there is no place safe to live, partly from lack of water and other sanitary needs. Don't be taken in by the Clinton administration's lies, when there are large craters where houses used to be, it's a Nato bomb and not a Serb artillery shell that did it!
*Is ( was ) the White House lying about using ( or it's plan to use ) American ground troops in Yugoslavian territory? Yes. The capture of three United States Army soldiers and their vehicle within Yugoslavian territory indicates that U.S. troops are ( were ) already ( fighting ) on Yugoslavian soil. Any lying spin from the Pentagon, State Department or White House that the Serbs crossed into Macedonia to capture them has been invalidated by the fact that they would have absolutely no motive for an action like that. Also, if you could think up some hostage-like reason for them to take three low rank soldiers prisoner, then why haven't the Serbs done anything yet? Lastly, if Serbian soldiers crossed into Macedonia, wouldn't the U.S. military have some high tech satellite photos of them? I believe logic tells us that these U.S. troops were within Yugoslavian territory, and as such, constitute that our ground troops have already been used!
Another indication that the White House is engaging in a spot of doublespeak, is when they said absolutely no ground troops but were quick to order Apache helicopters and MLRS rocket artillery batteries to be sent to the Yugoslavian theater. These two elements are United States Army fire support units. You heard that right, U-N-I-T-E-D S-T-A-T-E-S A-R-M-Y.
*Is NATO only bombing military targets in Yugoslavia? Yeah right, sure, whatever; tell that to the people of Belgrade. I got a bridge over here to sell you with a nice view of the Danube. Anyhow, send a ' NATO bombed the Yugo factory ' unemployed Serbian auto-worker an American taxpayer foreign aid entitlement check. You think that's funny or stupid? Someone is going to have to help them rebuild Belgrade and Pristina. Now, just who do you think is going to be footing that bill? Not NATO, I guarantee!
*Whole groups of refugees were missing and Serb forces were suspected ( and loudly blamed by just about all of the networks, I can't remember one that didn't...). It turns out that Macedonia had whisked them away at gunpoint in the middle of the night. It also turns out that Macedonia has closed it's border to the Muslim refugees from Kosovo ( I guess they don't want to have their own problem? ).
What really bugs me, is the way the Albanians, both foreign and domestic, and a large portion of our electorate have tried to legitimize the false comparisons being made with the situation now and the situation in World War II. The situation now just pales, when compared to fifty years ago. The two thousand casualties disappear, when put next to the six million Jews killed by the genocidal Nazi SS ( see: Clinton White House Backs Nazi Butchers From World War II! ( 4-2-99 ) ). I heard someone say that the ratio between the population and the alleged incidents of so-called deaths because of ethnic cleansing in Kosovo, is strikingly similar to the murder rate in the city of Washington D.C.? Is NATO going to come bomb some bridges on the Potomac river next? Anyhow, back to larger numbers again; the millions purged by Stalin in and around World War II are never talked about by the ' heads-that-be '. I just keep asking myself this same question, which I have no answer for; ' Why has the Clinton White House allied itself with a Muslim terrorist group called the Kosovo Liberation Army?' What must Israel think, huh ( now there's another country being humiliated by our actions beside Russia )?
- Bongo ( Feed me more Clinton propaganda to debunk? )
